The main aim of the evaluation program for academic teaching staff is improving the quality of teaching and research by ensuring that selection and access to different teaching figures and research personnel at Universitues is based on a person's merits and capacities.
The Organic Law 4/2007, of April 12, which modifies Organic Law 6/2001, of December 21, on Universities, requires a positive evaluation of PhD's activities prior to being employed as Lecturer of any public university.
This program strives to carry out the aforementioned evaluation for the accreditation of teaching and research staff as a way of ensuring a merit-based recruitment in the university system of the Balearic Islands. Since 2004, AQUIB, as the external evaluation body of this university system, has unfolded this program in order to guarantee the suitability of potential applicants to recruitment processes of contractual figures provided by the aforementioned Law. This process seeks to guarantee the accreditation of quality as well as the improvement of teaching and research activity.
People who are in possession of a doctoral degree may request prior evaluation of their teaching and research activity for be hired as contracted PhD lecturer and assistant PhD lecturer.
The evaluation procedure (available in Spanish and Catalan) is regulated by the Decree 178/2003, of October 31, which regulates the procedure to obtain the evaluation and accreditation of the AQUIB.
This Decree establishes that AQUIB must elaborate and approve the evaluation criteria for both figures, and must publish them in the Boletín Oficial de las Islas Baleares. The current criteria are published in the BOIB number 111 of 2013: Agreement 1/2013, of the Board of Directors of the Balearic Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, by which the criteria for evaluating the contractual figures of contracted PhD lecturer and assistant PhD lecturer are published. This document is available in Spanish and Catalan.
Notification due to the approval of the 2/2023, of 22 of March.
Due to the recent legal changes in Spain, AQUIB will not evaluate applications for contracted PhD lecturer and assistant PhD lecturer in 2023.
Evaluations must be made by independent, external experts with extensive knowledge in the corresponding scientific field through evaluation committees that are organized by scientific fields based in the areas of knowledge assigned to each one. The evaluation committees for this call are:
Committee
President: Maria Magdalena Polo Pujadas (Universitat de Barcelona)
Secretary: Ester Alba Pagán (Universidad de Valencia)
Member: Maria Josep Solé Sabater (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Member: Eliseo Serrano Martín (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Member: David Saurí Pujol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Substitute committee
Rosa Estopà Bagot (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), María Concepción Elena Fidalgo Hijano (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid); Marta Isabel González García (Universidad de Oviedo); Germán Navarro Espinach (Universidad de Zaragoza); Olga Pérez Monzón (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Committee
President: Ana María Serra Tort (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)
Secretary: Raquel Carmona Fernández (Universidad de Málaga)
Member: Javier José Loidi Arregui (Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea)
Member: José María Rodríguez-Izquierdo Gil (Universidad de Cádiz)
Member: Ismael José Mingarro Muñoz (Universitat de Vàlencia-Estudi General)
Substitute committee
María Ángeles Balboa García (Universidad de Valladolid); Javier Batlle Gelabert (Universitat de Barcelona); Nuria Eugenia Campillo Martín (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC); Ana María Coto Montes (Universidad de Oviedo); Rodrigo Morchón García (Universidad de Salamanca)
Committee
President: Carmen María Vázquez Cueto (Universidad de Sevilla)
Secretary: Antonio Ayala Gómez (Universidad de Sevilla)
Member: Tomás Gallego Izquierdo (Universidad de Alcalá de Henares)
Member: Juan José Vendrell Ortega (Universitat Rovira i Virgili)
Member: Rosario Isabel Ferrer Cascales (Universitat d’Alacant)
Substitute committee
Elena Alonso Aperte (Universidad San Pablo CEU); David Ballester Ferrando (Universitat de Girona); Maria Neus Carbó Carbó (Universitat de Barcelona); Marta Gil Lacruz (Universidad de Zaragoza); Manuel Rosety Rodríguez (Universidad de Cádiz)
Pending
Out of a global total of 105 applications evaluated, 70.48% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 59.05% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 67.74%
Negative evaluation: 32.26%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 40.95% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 74.42%
Negative evaluation: 25.58%
Out of a global total of 101 applications evaluated, 63.37% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 58.42% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 59.32%
Negative evaluation: 40.68%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 41.58% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 69.05%
Negative evaluation: 30.95%
2020
Out of a total of 112 applications evaluated, 65.18% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 55.36% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 61.29%
Negative evaluation: 38.71%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 44.64% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 70.00%
Negative evaluation: 30.00%
2019
Out of a global total of 100 applications evaluated, 67% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 59.00% of the total of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 64.41%
Negative evaluation: 35.59%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 41.00% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 70.73%
Negative evaluation: 29.27%
2018
Out of a global total of 90 applications evaluated, 68.89% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 53.33% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 68.75%
Negative evaluation: 31.25%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 46.67% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 69.05%
Negative evaluation: 30.95%
2017
Out of a global total of 90 applications evaluated, 55.21% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 50.00% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 54.17%
Negative evaluation: 45.83%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 50.00% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 56.25%
Negative evaluation: 43.75%
2016
Out of a total of 151 applications evaluated, 69.54% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 52.98% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 67.50%
Negative evaluation: 32.50%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 47.02% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 71.83%
Negative evaluation: 28.17%
2015
Out of a total of 96 applications evaluated, 65.63% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 57.29% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 58.18%
Negative evaluation: 41.82%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 42.71% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 75.61%
Negative evaluation: 24.39%
2014
Of a total of 45 applications received, 57.78% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 71.11% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 53.13%
Negative evaluation: 46.88%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 28.89% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 69.23%
Negative evaluation: 30.77%
2013
Out of a total of 76 applications received, 77.63% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 60.53% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 71.74%
Negative evaluation: 28.26%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 39.47% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 86.67%
Negative evaluation: 13.33%
2012
Out of a total of 103 applications received, 1.94% did not meet the minimum requirements to be evaluated. Of the remaining applications, 57.43% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 62.38% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 53.97%
Negative evaluation: 46.03%
Assistant PhD lecturer – 35.64% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 63.89%
Negative evaluation: 36.11%
Assistant professor - 1.98% of the total applications evaluated
Favorable report: 50.00%
Unfavorable report: 50.00%
2011
Out of a total of 221 applications received, 6.33% did not meet the minimum requirements to be evaluated. Of the remaining applications, 57.07% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 64.39% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 52.27%
Negative evaluation: 47.73%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 29.27 % of total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 66.67%
Negative evaluation: 33.33%
Assistant professor - 6.34% of the total applications evaluated
Favorable report: 61.54%
Unfavorable report: 38.46%
