The aim of the university faculty evaluation programme is to enhance the quality of teaching and research by ensuring merit and capability in the selection and appointment of various categories of academic staff (PDI) at universities.
Organic Law 2/2023, of 22 March, on the University System, mandates a positive prior evaluation of doctors' activities for their recruitment by public universities as permanent academic staff (PPL). This programme focuses on conducting such evaluations for the accreditation of PDI seeking these positions within the university system of the Balearic Islands.
The evaluation committees ensure an independent and transparent assessment in accordance with the evaluation criteria approved by AQUIB.
Establishment: Agreement 3/2025 of AQUIB's Board of Directors (Spanish, Catalan)
Composition: Agreement 4/2025 of AQUIB's Board of Directors (Spanish, Catalan)
Below you can find the composition of the committees and the CVs of their members:
Full members
President: María Magdalena Polo Pujadas (Universitat de Barcelona)
Secretary: Germán Navarro Espinach (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Vocal 1: María José Solé Sabater (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Vocal 2: Julio Juan Polo Sánchez (Universidad de Cantabria)
Vocal 3: David Saurí Pujol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Alternate members
President: José Barrientos Rastrojo (Universidad de Sevilla)
Secretary: Montserrat Duch Planas (Universitat Rovira i Virgili)
Vocal 1: Rosa Estopà Bagot (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)
Vocal 2: Benito Navarrete Prieto (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Vocal 3: Jorge Olcina Cantos (Universitat d'Alacant)
Full members
President: Ana María Serra Tort (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)
Secretary: Ismael José Mingarro Muñoz (Universitat de València)
Vocal 1: Javier José Loidi Arregui (Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea)
Vocal 2: José María Rodríguez-Izquierdo Gil (Universidad de Cádiz)
Vocal 3: Carlos Smerdou Gámez (Universidad de Málaga)
Alternate members
President: Javier Batlle Gelabert (Universitat de Barcelona)
Secretary: María Ángeles Balboa García (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas)
Vocal 1: Ana María Coto Montes (Universidad de Oviedo)
Vocal 2: Nuria Eugenia Campillo Martín (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas)
Vocal 3: Rodrigo Morchón García (Universidad de Salamanca)
Full members
Presidenta: Carmen María Vázquez Cueto (Universidad de Sevilla)
Secretaria: Rosa María Baños Rivera (Universitat de València)
Vocal 1: Tomás Gallego Izquierdo (Universidad de Alcalá de Henares)
Vocal 2: Antonio Ayala Gómez (Universidad de Sevilla)
Vocal 3: Juan José Vendrell Ortega (Universitat Rovira i Virgili)
Alternate members
Presidenta: Elena Alonso Aperte (Universidad San Pablo CEU)
Secretaria: María del Pilar Carrera Levillain (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
Vocal 1: Daniel López López (Universidad de la Coruña)
Vocal 2: María Dolores Girón González (Universidad de Granada)
Vocal 3: Manuel Rosety Rodríguez (Universidad de Cádiz)
Out of a global total of 105 applications evaluated, 70.48% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 59.05% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 67.74%
Negative evaluation: 32.26%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 40.95% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 74.42%
Negative evaluation: 25.58%
Out of a global total of 101 applications evaluated, 63.37% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 58.42% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 59.32%
Negative evaluation: 40.68%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 41.58% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 69.05%
Negative evaluation: 30.95%
2020
Out of a total of 112 applications evaluated, 65.18% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 55.36% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 61.29%
Negative evaluation: 38.71%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 44.64% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 70.00%
Negative evaluation: 30.00%
2019
Out of a global total of 100 applications evaluated, 67% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 59.00% of the total of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 64.41%
Negative evaluation: 35.59%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 41.00% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 70.73%
Negative evaluation: 29.27%
2018
Out of a global total of 90 applications evaluated, 68.89% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 53.33% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 68.75%
Negative evaluation: 31.25%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 46.67% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 69.05%
Negative evaluation: 30.95%
2017
Out of a global total of 90 applications evaluated, 55.21% obtained a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 50.00% of the total number of applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 54.17%
Negative evaluation: 45.83%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 50.00% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 56.25%
Negative evaluation: 43.75%
2016
Out of a total of 151 applications evaluated, 69.54% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 52.98% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 67.50%
Negative evaluation: 32.50%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 47.02% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 71.83%
Negative evaluation: 28.17%
2015
Out of a total of 96 applications evaluated, 65.63% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 57.29% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 58.18%
Negative evaluation: 41.82%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 42.71% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 75.61%
Negative evaluation: 24.39%
2014
Of a total of 45 applications received, 57.78% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 71.11% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 53.13%
Negative evaluation: 46.88%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 28.89% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 69.23%
Negative evaluation: 30.77%
2013
Out of a total of 76 applications received, 77.63% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 60.53% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 71.74%
Negative evaluation: 28.26%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 39.47% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 86.67%
Negative evaluation: 13.33%
2012
Out of a total of 103 applications received, 1.94% did not meet the minimum requirements to be evaluated. Of the remaining applications, 57.43% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 62.38% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 53.97%
Negative evaluation: 46.03%
Assistant PhD lecturer – 35.64% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 63.89%
Negative evaluation: 36.11%
Assistant professor - 1.98% of the total applications evaluated
Favorable report: 50.00%
Unfavorable report: 50.00%
2011
Out of a total of 221 applications received, 6.33% did not meet the minimum requirements to be evaluated. Of the remaining applications, 57.07% received a positive evaluation.
Contracted PhD lecturer - 64.39% of the total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 52.27%
Negative evaluation: 47.73%
Assistant PhD lecturer - 29.27 % of total applications evaluated
Positive evaluation: 66.67%
Negative evaluation: 33.33%
Assistant professor - 6.34% of the total applications evaluated
Favorable report: 61.54%
Unfavorable report: 38.46%
